

Then why are the liberal reformers and lawmakers so reluctant to move on abolishing the executive presidency? It is because the office of the executive president is being projected as the custodian of law, order and property in these tumultuous times. There has been no moment in the last four decades more opportune than this to rid the country of this undemocratic institution. Such executive overreach has been the bane of problems in Sri Lanka. Indeed, on July 18, within days of assuming office as acting President, Ranil Wickremesinghe declared an Emergency, to supposedly ensure the safety of parliamentarians who are to vote for a President on July 20.


The great revolt of the masses has overthrown an authoritarian president in Sri Lanka, but it has not abolished the executive presidency. A revolt that could turn into a revolutionĬourtesy The Hindu Without a new social contract, there could be unrestrained conflict with the working people in Sri Lanka
